Re: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

[John Erickson <john_erickson@hplb.hpl.hp.com>]

Bob wrote:

> ...I think it would be a mistake to call out the
> issuer of the permissions in such a definition.
> They certainly may come from parties other than
> those you list...

JSE: Bob's definitely right. There should not be a presumption that the
entity/entities declaring the rules is also the originator/provider of the
service. All we could talk about is the originator/issuer of the rules ---
permissions --- themselves.


-----Original Message-----
From: John Erickson [mailto:john_erickson@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:59 AM
To: rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

I'm wondering if it would be appropriate to include language such as:
"...By
'permissions' we mean a set of usage rules declared by the originator or
provider of an object or service, that is used by a compliant
interpreter (such
as a virtual machine) to control a recipient's access to and usage of
the object
or service...."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Reddy, Hari" <Hari.Reddy@CONTENTGUARD.COM>
To: <rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:17 PM
Subject: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed


Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

Hello Everyone:
For Wed's meeting, I have integrated the introduction from Parama and
reformated
the Requirements Document. I am submitting this as Rev 14 - Proposed
since we
need to discuss the introduction.

Regards,
Hari






----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>