OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

rsa-interop-demo message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [rsa-interop-demo] New designs for the RSA Interop booth (2115)


I am fine with there not being a chair per vendor, but I will need access to a chair for breaks because of my bad foot. In years past, I used a shared chair, which is fine

Valerie 



Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 17, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Jane Harnad <jharnad@oasis-open.org> wrote:

Hi Tony (and Everyone),

Thanks for the feedback.

We have honestly been working hard to incorporate as many of the groups requests from the latest re-design. Unfortunately, it's turned out to be quite challenging from a budget perspective. Below are a few more details from our end on that front, as well as replies to Tony's comments to the list.


1.) The pod design. There are a few issues involved. The original designs all had a sharing aspect to them (back-to-back, shared counters, etc.) This helped to keep the costs within our budget. Because the group would like to separate each pod out and change the dimensions -- there is a lot more customization involved. And unfortunately, that comes with a larger price tag. We were told that the original pod design with the adjustments would no longer fit our budget. Instead, our contractor came up with a new design that tried to pull in as many of the needed features as possible -- and still make it fit within our budget.

What we can try is to delete/alter the items you requested and see if the contractor can come up with something on the backside of the pods that is more to the groups liking (i.e. more open; closer to the original pod backing). Unfortunately, we can't make any promises, but I'll certainly give it a try.  

As a reminder -- alterations and deletions from Tony included:
  • Remove all seating
  • Decreasing the size of the monitors from 32" to 24"
  • And removing the OASIS counter entirely


3.) Pod placement. The current placement of the pods (U-shape instead of closed loop) was our effort to try and fit as many requested components into the space as possible. The recommendation I noted in my email was to shift the presentation/tower to the front of the U and delete the OASIS counter entirely. This option would not obstruct any vision between pods, and would allow the group to keep the monitor and booth branding up front.

We'll have the contractor close the loop and arrange it per the diagram.

4.) Towers with monitors. Unfortunately, due to space and budget constraints we were not able to add an additional tower/monitor to the booth. A few options were noted in my email to the group which included:

  • Removing the presentation component entirely (keeping just the tower).
  • Or alternating the slide shows on the one monitor.

We do have some flexibility on moving the tower around the booth. BTW: Moving the tower to the center was at the suggestion of the contractor. They're worried this new layout will be very tight and felt this would help (as the center is dead space).  

I hope this clarifies some of the issues noted in Tony's message. I have a few action items to take back to the contractor -- and will supply the group with revised layout as soon as possible.  

Thanks so much, Jane


On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Tony Cox <tony.cox@cryptsoft.com> wrote:

Hi Jane,

Feedback from my perspective:

  • Differs quite significantly from the design agreed by vote by the participants
  • There are still seats included despite feedback provided that there should be no seats at all (as per previous years and as per the design agreed by vote by the participants)
  • The layout agreed was specifically designed to provide visibility between vendors whilst minimizing obstruction of flow between pods. The proposed design draft has a range of items that basically preclude this:
    • Solid backs on monitor stands - one of the design elements from your original four proposals that absolutely opens up the sense of community has now been lost
    • Larger monitors (the consensus was that 24" was sufficient for individual pods)
    • The actual pod layout is very different (a shield shape replaced with a U-shape)
    • The central pillar should not be there
    • We had decided on two monitor towers as we have two TCs on the booth and need a clearer separation between the messaging for the PKCS#11 interop showcase and the KMIP interop demonstration (and for the OASIS representation as well)
    • The OASIS bench (although it looks great) will disrupt the flow in the current configuration
    • The single monitor behind a desk blocking the left/right traffic flow will be very ineffective - the agreed design deliberately separated out the displays and OASIS presence from the collection of pods while allowing traffic low

We worked hard as a group to try to incorporate elements from the original designs as proposed and it seems some of the excellent ideas from those original designs that were incorporated in the four options that went into the vote have not been retained.

In my opinion, if we are going to redesign the booth again, this should be taken to a formal ballot as the current design is simply sufficiently different to not actually represent any of the options previously presented for a vote.

Thanks,

Tony Cox

Director Business Development, Strategy & Alliances

Cryptsoft

P:  +61 7 3103 0321, US:  +1 (650) 918 4307

tony.cox@cryptsoft.com
https://calendly.com/tony-cox (book a meeting)

On 17/12/2016 2:13 AM, Jane Harnad wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I finally received the revised designs back from our contractor. Please find supporting diagrams and photos attached for your review.

Fortunately, the contractor was able to accommodate the same monitor size along with the new dimensions for the counters. They will remain at 32". Unfortunately, we are not able to fit two large video monitor in the new design (per the request). So, only one is reflected in the new design. (As a reminder, these video monitors were requested to run slides outlining the KMIP and PKCS11 demonstrations (one per demonstration).

So, we'd like to hear from the group on what to do with the existing video monitor. Our options include:

1.) Delete the video component entirely and use the fund for something else -- i.e. PKCS11/KMIP designed booth giveaway, other. 

2.) Run both videos on the one screen -- alternating as needed. With this options, we would suggest deleting the OASIS front counter, so the video monitor could be more accessible.

Please circulate your feedback to the list. Our deadline to send any final adjustments to the contractor is Tuesday, 20 Dec (12:00 PM ET).

Thanks so much, Jane


--

Jane Harnad

Manager, Events

OASIS | Advancing open standards for the information society 
+1.781.425.5073 x214 (Office)
http://www.oasis-open.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 




--

Jane Harnad

Manager, Events

OASIS | Advancing open standards for the information society 
+1.781.425.5073 x214 (Office)
http://www.oasis-open.org



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]