RE: [s-ramp] Groups - S-RAMP Issues Document (S-RAMP-Issues--FINAL_v1.0.pdf) uploaded

[Vince Brunssen <brunssen@us.ibm.com>]

Peter,

The documents that I recently posted are the documents that are available on s-ramp.org. These documents, are as you eluded to the contributions of the four authoring companies (HP, IBM, Software AG and TIBCO). So, they are "final" in that sense of the term. I agree, that we could have used a better naming convention, but I also did not want to change the name of the contributed documents from s-ramp.org so there would not be any confusion. Also, it is stated in the charter that these are the documents that would be contributed.

These documents will be the starting point for the working drafts of the S-RAMP TC. So, there will be ample opportunity for discussion and contribution to the working drafts of both the Foundation Document and the ATOM Binding Document. We will also be going over the issues document in more detail in the first scheduled TC meeting on January 5, 2011. At that time we will get the issues logged as Action Items and get started to work on these as well as any other issues that members may bring forward.

I hope that this helps.

--Vince

Regards,
Vince Brunssen
Senior Software Engineer
Emerging Technologies
512-286-5487 (External)
363-5487 (T/L)

Peter F Brown at work ---12/19/2010 06:25:31 PM---Hi, Not everyone was able to make the first meeting call and I have seen three documents posted in t

From:	Peter F Brown at work <peter@peterfbrown.com>
To:	Vince Brunssen/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org" <s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	12/19/2010 06:25 PM
Subject:	RE: [s-ramp] Groups - S-RAMP Issues Document (S-RAMP-Issues--FINAL_v1.0.pdf) uploaded

---

Hi,
Not everyone was able to make the first meeting call and I have seen three documents posted in the last few minutes that are all labeled "Final".
This is a filenaming mistake I presume, as no such status exists within the OASIS TC process.
I hope that all members of the TC and the wider community get substantial opportunity to comment and discuss all the submissions.
If, on the other hand they are "final" in the sense of being some definitive contribution by an OASIS member (in the TC process sense of a contribution) then that would make more sense but it might be better to avoid the label Final completely to avoid misunderstandings!
Cheers,
Peter

Peter F Brown
Independent Consultant
www.peterfbrown.com
@pensivepeter
+1.310.694.2278
Until 9 January: +32.472.027.812

Sent from my Windows Phone - Apologies for typos, levity and brevity - it's hard to type on a moving planet


-----Original Message-----
From: brunssen@us.ibm.com
Sent: Monday, 20 December, 2010 1:09
To: s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [s-ramp] Groups - S-RAMP Issues Document (S-RAMP-Issues--FINAL_v1.0.pdf) uploaded



> The document named S-RAMP Issues Document (S-RAMP-Issues--FINAL_v1.0.pdf)
> has been submitted by Mr. Vincent Brunssen to the OASIS SOA Repository
> Artifact Model and Protocol (S-RAMP) TC document repository.
> 
> Document Description:
> This is the issues document that was contributed to the OASIS S-RAMP TC by
> the four authoring companies (HP, IBM, Software AG and TIBCO).  
> 
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=40618
> 
> Download Document:  
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/40618/S-RAMP-Issues--FINAL_v1.0.pdf
> 
> 
> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
> may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste
> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
> 
> -OASIS Open Administration

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php