Re: [s-ramp] S-RAMP namespace(s)

[Vince Brunssen <brunssen@us.ibm.com>]

Randall,

Thanks for tracking this down. I think the namespace you are proposing is correct based on the guidelines set forth by OASIS that you reference below.

I will make sure to get this Issue-002 added to JIRA once we have JIRA set up. Then we can start a discussion about the merits of one namespace versus several namespaces.

Regards,
Vince Brunssen
Senior Software Engineer
Emerging Technologies
512-286-5487 (External)
363-5487 (T/L)

Randall Hauch ---01/05/2011 11:12:34 AM---One of the fields on the template request form asks for a list of namespaces that will be defined/us

From:	Randall Hauch <rhauch@redhat.com>
To:	s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	01/05/2011 11:12 AM
Subject:	[s-ramp] S-RAMP namespace(s)

---

One of the fields on the template request form asks for a list of namespaces that will be defined/used in the work products. These namespaces are to follow the posted guidelines [1], and ours will generally follow this format:

		 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/s-ramp/xxxx

where "xxxx" is a short string (see [1] for exact requirements). Considering this format, the "http://s-ramp.org/xmlns/2010/s-ramp" namespace used by the submitted documents, and Issue-002 (which states the decision was made to use a single namespace rather than several), I propose requesting the following namespace:

		 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/s-ramp/2011

This would also allow us to tack on additional segments after "2011" if additional namespaces are needed. Thoughts?

Best regards,

Randall Hauch
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat


[1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html#xml-namespaces
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php