[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SRAMP-3) RDF/OWL vs XML Schema

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SRAMP-3?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=24610#action_24610 ] 

Randall Hauch commented on SRAMP-3:
-----------------------------------

Using OWL/RDF as the formal description of the metamodel would provide for a more accurate and rich logical representation, and would also make it easier for the repository to expose these descriptions to client. (See SRAMP-25)

> RDF/OWL vs XML Schema
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: SRAMP-3
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SRAMP-3
>             Project: OASIS SOA Repository Artifact Model and Protocol (S-RAMP) TC
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Foundation
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>         Environment: N/A
>            Reporter: Vincent Brunssen
>            Assignee: Linda Terlouw 
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> Issue-003 from the contributed issues document
> Should we create an RDF/OWL based meta model view. This would provide a better way to leverage
> semantics to create new types of artifacts, etc., allow clients lacking full S-RAMP knowledge to get more
> value out of these documents. It would also provide an alternative description of the spec using RDF/OWL.
> This would change the specification significantly. Needs careful consideration, but does increase ease of
> extensibility.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira