[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [s-ramp] arbitrary boundaries question
Kurt,
With regards to this issue, the XSDs as written have boundaries which in this case I think mean the cardinality. So, I believe that the idea of this particular issue was to check to make sure that the cardinality is set properly and that everything matches up with the diagrams and examples that are in the documents. That is how I remember this discussion. If anyone else remembers it differently then please correct me.
| Kurt T Stam <kstam@redhat.com> |
| "s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org" <s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org>, |
| 03/21/2012 06:13 PM |
| [s-ramp] arbitrary boundaries question |
| <s-ramp@lists.oasis-open.org> |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]