OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

s-ramp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SRAMP-36) Batch Processing: Content-Type Multipart/HTML no longer valid


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SRAMP-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=30624#action_30624 ] 

Martin Smithson  commented on SRAMP-36:
---------------------------------------

While I am happy with the huge majority of the changes that result from this proposal, I am concerned the modifications to the reponses will make it more difficult for S-RAMP clients to process the results of batch POSTs or publishing of a "package" file.  The reason for this is that the proposal replaces the:

    Content-Type: application/atom+xml;type=entry

header in each part of the multipart response with a:

    Content-Type: message/http; version=1.1;msgtype=response 

header.  This does not provide the client with enough information about the body of response in the message part in order to process it.  This may also limit the extensibility of the batch processing in the future if we need to return different types/formats of data in each part of the multpart response.

> Batch Processing: Content-Type Multipart/HTML no longer valid
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SRAMP-36
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SRAMP-36
>             Project: OASIS SOA Repository Artifact Model and Protocol (S-RAMP) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Atom Binding
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Vincent Brunssen
>            Assignee: Martin Smithson 
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> During the discussion of issue SRAMP-8 it was discovered that  Batch Processing has some issues regarding the use of content type.  The Content Type is shown to be multipart/html.  However, Martin Smithson commented to the group that multipart/html was only proposed and this proposal has since expired.  The TC needs to work to figure out which multipart/???? is the correct one to use and make appropriate changes.  The multipart/???? options can be found at http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]