[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (SRAMP-75) Consider removing the updateContent and deleteContent capabilities
Brett Meyer created SRAMP-75: -------------------------------- Summary: Consider removing the updateContent and deleteContent capabilities Key: SRAMP-75 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/SRAMP-75 Project: OASIS SOA Repository Artifact Model and Protocol (S-RAMP) TC Issue Type: Task Reporter: Brett Meyer Most importantly, in my opinion, these capabilities directly violate the concept of a "repository". Rather than allowing content modifications, it would be better to focus on updates through *versioning*, but allow the deprecated versions to remain permanently. Further, updateContent/deleteContent introduce numerous technical issues. What happens if an artifact has derived artifacts? What happens if those derived artifacts have relationships pointing to them, or custom properties defined on them? I'd argue that automatically removing or updating those would violate the "impact analysis" use case and could directly result in numerous conflicts. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]