+1On 16 Mar 2010, at 13:31, Lipton, Paul C wrote: OCCI was only one purpose, IMHO. We need a committee approved general version asap, too.
Thanks,
Paul (from mobile)
----- Original Message -----
From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com <Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org <saf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tue Mar 16 05:10:15 2010
Subject: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck
Following my last email, we should finalize, motion, and vote on the FAQ on Thursday to accept it as a Committee Draft (Full Majority Vote -i.e. more than 50% of the voting members).
I am not sure if we should do the same with the slidedeck at this point as it is focused on OCCi interactions. If we generalize it for educational purposes then we should vote on it as well.
Thoughts?
Stavros
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com > Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited Hayes Park Central Hayes End Road Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE Reg. No. 4153469
+44-7590-293439 (Mobile)
______________________________________________________________________
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
Registered No. 4153469
This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that
it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.
|
|