OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

saf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck


Title: Re: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

Let me be specific. The OCCI presentation contains material from this TC that is in WD form. At the end or someplace convenient there should be a line that says something very close to: “This presentation contains working draft material developed by the OASIS SAF Technical Committee. This presentation does not necessarily reflect the views of the OASIS SAF TC or of OASIS.”

 

That way, the contributions of the SAF TC to the content is acknowledged (as it should be), but the SAF TC is not obligated and no insinuation of OASIS endorsement is made.

 

Please let me know if this is a problem.

 

Thanks,

Paul

 

Paul Lipton

VP, Industry Standards and Open Source

Member, CA Council for Technical Excellence

Phone (preferred number!): +1 215 539-2731

Mobile: +1 267 987-6887

Email: paul.lipton@ca.com

cid:image001.gif@01C83B50.20DA2990

THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED OR OTHER LEGALLY PROTECTED INFORMATION. IT IS INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. IF YOU ARE NOT THE ADDRESSEE (OR SOMEONE THE ADDRESSEE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE), YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM COPYING, DISTRIBUTING OR OTHERWISE USING IT. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER AND RETURN IT AT OUR COST. THANK YOU.

 

 

From: Lipton, Paul C [mailto:Paul.Lipton@ca.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:32 AM
To: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com; saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

 

OCCI was only one purpose, IMHO. We need a committee approved general version asap, too.

Thanks,
Paul (from mobile)

----- Original Message -----
From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com <Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org <saf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tue Mar 16 05:10:15 2010
Subject: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck

Following my last email, we should finalize, motion, and vote on the FAQ on Thursday to accept it as a Committee Draft (Full Majority Vote -i.e. more than 50% of the voting members).

I am not sure if we should do the same with the slidedeck at this point as it is focused on OCCi interactions. If we generalize it for educational purposes then we should vote on it as well.

Thoughts?

Stavros



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]