RE: [saf] Going forward in 2011

Hi Paul,

I am on board with you. Any other liaison discussions are now under the light of our single official liaison, so we have much less resources to allocate (and they were already depleted!).

Cheers,

Stavros

PS. As you probably know, we're looking into open sourcing a prototype. More to come soon.

From: Lipton, Paul C [mailto:Paul.Lipton@ca.com]
Sent: 16 February 2011 00:11
To: Stavros Isaiadis; saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [saf] Going forward in 2011

Hi all,

I would also examine the possibility of reducing scope of liaison activity considerably unless others want to pursue. I don’t have the cycles right now. Personally, I think even Case Management liaison is secondary to just reaching closure at this point. Create 1.0, update white paper just to be accurate, use cloud profile as a concrete instantiation and publish/close. That’s a lot in itself. Open sourcing some tools might help.

You might get a different statement when I am in a different mood, of course! :-)

Thanks,

Paul

Paul Lipton

CA Technologies

VP, Industry Standards and Open Source

Member, CA Council for Technical Excellence

Office Phone: +1 609 583-9718

Mobile: +1 267 987-6887

Email: paul.lipton@ca.com

THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED OR OTHER LEGALLY PROTECTED INFORMATION. IT IS INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. IF YOU ARE NOT THE ADDRESSEE (OR SOMEONE THE ADDRESSEE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE), YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM COPYING, DISTRIBUTING OR OTHERWISE USING IT. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER AND RETURN IT AT OUR COST. THANK YOU.

From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com [mailto:Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 8:08 AM
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [saf] Going forward in 2011

Hi all,

my request for availability relates to discussions around our strategy going forward in 2011, publishing a spec, and making the best of our liaison (and other collaborations). I have drafted some sort of agenda that we can discuss in the call today iff there are enough participants, otherwise we should talk about the technical issues.

- Milestones:

· Spec v1.0 out (by summer)

§ Mature draft with all technical issues resolved

· White paper updated (mid-summer)

§ following or during our spec public review?

· Cloud profile

§ mapping to standards like DMTF CMWG and OGF

§ dependant on their publication dates (do we know anything?)

· REST binding appendix possibly

§ As a recommendation in a separate document or appendix in spec?

- Liaison

· How do we advertise?

§ OASIS newsletter

§ Common message (which forum?)

· Common Use Case development (will drive the cloud profile as well)

§ or maybe adopt some of their own?

· Common white paper

· Profile verification by liaison group

· Participation in their F2F (who is available)

- F2F in late March / early April to finalize some (or all) technical issues

· Probably in the US

- Membership

· Revive IBM participation (ideas?)

· Waiting on interested University

· Engagement strategy for getting onboard some members from the liaison group

Any comments more than welcomed.

Cheers,

Stavros

______________________________________________________________________

 Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited

 Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE

 Registered No. 4153469

 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and

 may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised

 use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this

 e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that

 it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.

saf message