OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

saf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Additional discussion needed on Types Registry

See the 7/25 meeting notes.

We have a few topics that could use further (email) discussion prior to the next meeting.  Some comments from the meeting are in italics.


    • Should the Types Registry only include SymptomType and PrescriptionType, or also include SyndromeType & ProtocolType?
      • Effectively, the Catalog “is” the place where SyndromeType & ProtocolType are defined.  Maybe the Catalog could also be the place where SymptomType & PrescriptionType are defined?
    • Should Symptom/PrescriptionType definitions be optional? 
      • Without these definitions it would be difficult to author a Syndrome & Protocol, but not impossible.  One could do manual analysis of the Symptom Store to understand the content & arguments schema.  Ideally the SymptomEmitter and Practitioner would provide these types, but (again) not required.
    • What does definition look like? 
      • SymptomType
        • Type
        • Content schema (xml schema)
      • PrescriptionType
        • Type
        • Argument schema (xml schema)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]