OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

saf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: Some points in the spec

Do we need an “Unknown” as part of “effectiveness?”  That would mean every enumeration would have six possible values, which would add some symmetry (which always seems right).


One other minor semantic concern:  As I think this through, “likelihood” seems like it is has a different connotation than “frequency” so the enumeration terms seem “wrong” somehow.  It seems like we could use the same enumeration values as most of the other enumeration types perhaps.  (Maybe I’m not thinking about this right though)


From: saf@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:saf@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Isaiadis, Stavros
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:36 AM
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [saf] Some points in the spec


Hi all,


As we approach a more polished version we would like to vote on, here’s some points to consider:


  • Enumerations such as Impact, Risk, Likelihood, and Urgency: I propose adding two more levels to make them more granular, and eliminate the name of the enum as a suffix of the values. Specifically:

Likelihood {VeryFrequent, Frequent, Balanced, Infrequent, Rare, NotAvailable}

Impact {VeryHigh, High, Moderate, Low, Minimal, Unknown}

Urgency {VeryHigh, High, Moderate, Low, Minimal, Unknown}

Risk {VeryHigh, High, Moderate, Low, Minimal, Unknown}

Duration{VeryLong, Long, Moderate, Short, VeryShort, Unknown}

Effectiveness {Effective, PartiallyEffective, BestEffort, Ineffective, Inconclusive}


  • Adding examples of the elements right after the pseudo schemas, and in the end in the appendix pull all the examples together in a scenario-based one, following our medical sequence diagram. This would clarify things a lot probably.
  • Conformance: I don’t think we have anything special to add here
  • Non-normative text: we should just remove this section


More may come later. Thoughts?





This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited.
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.

References to "Sender" are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC Insured * Are Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit * Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]