[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Any work on WSDL for restricted SAML responder?
> True, but as you point out even ripping off the current protocol bits > doesn't solve the problem on the response side since the statements > would still be encapsulated in an Assertion element. Yep. > I don't think that is solvable as long as mixing of statements types > is allowed in an Assertion. (If you only wanted to allow one type of > statement this could be solved by extending Assertion for each type of > statement instead of encapsulating statements in an Assertion.) Well, right, it's solved by changing the original decision to create a two level data model as a way of boxcarring statements. I don't favor the current design, particularly (it seems to confuse the hell out of people and it leads to clumsy specification language in places), but it may be too late. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]