OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

saml-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Re: RE : [saml-dev] Which version to use?


My comment was based upon your answer, so it is appropriate, since this is not a Liberty forum

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Inactive hide details for "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>"Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>


          "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>

          11/09/2004 07:06 AM


To

Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS

cc

"anastase adonis" <aadonis@objective-networks.com>, "Simon James" <james.simon@sun.com>, Jean-NoŽl Colin <jean-noel.colin@oxys.be>, saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject

Re: [saml-dev] Re: RE : [saml-dev] Which version to use?



Anthony Nadalin wrote on 11/9/2004, 7:04 AM:

>ID-WSF will continue its march forward and will support both SAML 1.x
(Liberty ID-FF) and SAML 2.x assertions.


Also all the other WS-* (in OASIS, W3C, etc.) efforts will move forward along with the various web services platforms, so one question will be what additional value does ID-WSF bring ?

This is not the right forum to discuss this subject. I was answering a specific question.

Conor

GIF image



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]