RE: [saml-dev] SAML, trust and WS.

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> Hi when you say reasobly clean in SAML 2.0,
> do you mean Liberty based on SAML 2.0 ?

No, I meant that the semantics can be expressed in a relatively reasonable
way in SAML 2.0 but not in SAML 1.1.

> I didn't see a solution using a pure SAML 2.0 approach.
> I'm kind of interested in finding some SAML specific approach 
> (for semplicity and to build a prove of concept)
> How would you approach this problem ? Any idea ?

My straw man on how one *might* consider doing it is an individual
submission to the Shibboleth project.

https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/ShibPortals

-- Scott