[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] modify assertion attributes.
> > If I'd been more aggesssive, I might have made the argument that > > attributes and NameIDs should be treated more uniformly (as in fact > > they are the > same > > thing), but I didn't push it. > > I realize it is _way_ too late but I wish you would have > tried to push that argument. Yeah, but that argument could be used about every piece of data within the assertion (they are all attributes of one form or another anyway). Where does one draw the line? I think that SAML should, for all well defined data elements within its area of control, define well defined locations for that data that is not dependent upon some generic attribute element (e.g. having a NameID element within Subject is the right thing to do - as opposed to having a generic "NameID" attribute name that goes in a generic AttributeStatement). Conor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]