RE: [saml-dev] Subject in the AuthRequest.

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> If from I guess its policies the IDP allow the key, would 
> then build an assertion (after authentication) with the same 
> subject+confirmation as specified in the request (is this a 
> MUST/MAY or SHOULD)?

It's a MUST, but not a testable MUST. The confirmation has to be
"equivalent". I could specify ds:KeyName of "Foo" and get back a literal key
that is understood to be the same.

All interop ends at ds:KeyInfo.

-- Scott