[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] strongly matches
> This perhaps should be errata. The weasel language was all that was agreed to during the process, if people can agree to more now, that's fine. I think I probably misspoke on the attributes though. I think the IdP is free to insert or modify the conditional attributes to some degree. Certainly so in the case of an AuthnRequest. > > along with the other simple content, > > Such as a nested <NameID> element? If so, this, too, should > be errata. NameID in this context is somewhat like KeyInfo, identifying something for implementations, but not really in a normative way. It would be legal for the NameID to identify the same principal in different ways, I think. At least, that would be my opinion. That said, it's probably not all that useful to do that, not to the same degree as with KeyInfo. All in all, I don't think anything but Method is very safe to assume anything about. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]