[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Minor inconsistency in SAML 2 spec?
> For the record, some people have complicated definitions of > it, mine was minimal, it's whoever tries to give an assertion > to a relying party in order to accomplish something. The Core > definition is worded passively in a tautological way, which > is not real helpful. I understand; thanks for the clarification. josh.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]