RE: [saml-dev] SAML 1.1 Multiple Attribute Statement

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Scott Cantor wrote on 2009-03-04:
> Naveen wrote on 2009-03-04:
>> I am also hearing for interoperability it is better to avoid multiple
>> AttributeStatement. I would appreciate if you could provide more
>> information on how off-the-shelf Federation product/Shibboleth handles
>> multiple AttributeStatement .
> 
> That has to come from the vendors, but if it matters to the product, it's
a
> bug. That's all that can be said.

Qualifying my own comment, obviously that's profile dependent at the end of
the day. If the profile doesn't preclude multiple statements, then by
definition they have to be supported since core allows it.

-- Scott