Re: [saml-dev] X509v3 vs. X509PKIPathv1 in signature part in WSS/ SOAP message security

[Chad La Joie <chad.lajoie@switch.ch>]

I think you posted in the wrong list.  This is the SAM list, not the WSS 
list.  You're question would be more appropriately posted to the later 
since you're not asking about SAML security tokens.

Shlomo Yona wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wonder how popular is the usage of ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509PKIPathv1"; vs. the usage of ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509v3"; in BinarySecurityToken elements. Apparently, the former is more popular than the latter. Is your experience in the ``field'' too?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Shlomo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Net Services
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
chad.lajoie@switch.ch, http://www.switch.ch