saml-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [saml-dev] relative position of RelayState parameter in URL

From: "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: bhaskar jain <bhaskar.jain2002@gmail.com>, "saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"<saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:59:42 +0000

On 3/31/11 12:57 PM, "bhaskar jain" <bhaskar.jain2002@gmail.com> wrote:
>  The question is whether we have any relative ordering of the
>"SAMLRequest" and "RelayState" (if present) in the URL.

Not unless you mean for signing purposes. The actual order, no.

-- Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [saml-dev] relative position of RelayState parameter in URL
  - From: bhaskar jain <bhaskar.jain2002@gmail.com>

References:
- relative position of RelayState parameter in URL
  - From: bhaskar jain <bhaskar.jain2002@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]