[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] question on Holder fo the key
On 5/24/11 1:39 PM, "Eric Heflin" <eheflin@medicity.com> wrote: >Also, wouldn't the "bearer" SubjectConfirmation method be a closer match >to these requirements than "holder-of-key"? No, the message included a key and I guess was relying on client TLS, which is fine. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]