[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Second Artifact in SAML Bindings doc
Scott, thanks! -Takashi (11/08/17 0:48), Cantor, Scott wrote: > On 8/15/11 11:54 PM, "Takashi Shitamichi"<takashi.shitamichi@oracle.com> > wrote: >> I have a question. >> >> At step 6, 7 and 8, a second Artifact is introduced in case of >> unspecified interactions. I think those interactions of step 6-8 are >> "optional" or can be changed/added with any other interactions. Is my >> understanding correct? I believe they do not mean "MUST". > The example is showing artifacts in both directions. 3.6.5, among other > sections, discusses the nature of HTTP bindings and their composability. > There is no MUST stated or implied in the example. > > -- Scott > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]