saml-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?

From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "baronsz@freemail.hu" <baronsz@freemail.hu>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:56:10 +0000

On 2/5/14, 10:53 AM, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com"
<Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

>XML Signature 2.0 should help with the crypto revisions without requiring
>other changes.  Are there additional use cases requiring XAdES?

Frederick, I think you mean 1.1, right?

-- Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>

References:
- SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: Szabó Áron <baronsz@freemail.hu>
- Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]