saml-dev message

Subject: Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:21:27 +0000

yes I did Scott, my mistake in typing.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:56 AM, ext Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:

> On 2/5/14, 10:53 AM, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com"
> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
>> XML Signature 2.0 should help with the crypto revisions without requiring
>> other changes.  Are there additional use cases requiring XAdES?
> 
> Frederick, I think you mean 1.1, right?
> 
> -- Scott
> 
>

References:
- SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: Szabó Áron <baronsz@freemail.hu>
- Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Re: [saml-dev] SHA-1 vs. SHA-2/SHA-3/etc.?
  - From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>