saml-dev message

Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Clarification on SAML2 "Time Values"

From: Peter Schober <peter.schober@univie.ac.at>
To: saml-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:35:12 +0200

* Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> [2014-09-23 09:05]:
> Should section 1.3.3 be interpreted as
> "MUST be expressed in the canonical "dateTime" representation
> (section 3.2.7.2 of [Schema2]) for timezoned values
> (i.e. expressed in UTC with "Z" as time zone component)."
> or is the "Z" suffix in the example wrong?

See this similar question to this list from a year ago:
http://markmail.org/thread/yqyjmtdqm4x3cgdr
-peter

References:
- Clarification on SAML2 "Time Values"
  - From: "Dieter Maurer" <dieter@handshake.de>