RE: [saml-dev] SAML 2.0 IsPassive option

["Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> theoretically such seemless authentication is still within the bounds of
> the isPassive definition. Such authentication methods could probably
> involve:
> * kerberos (as long as the 401 page is not being displayed to the
> end-user after failed login)

Which you can't generally guarantee.

> Cert based authn is also similar, but with that the browser will ask for
> the password of the private key, not sure if that qualifies as passive
> authn.

If the user sees anything (other than temporary transiting pages or redirects) but the site they started at, the IdP has violated the standard.

-- Scott