Re: [saml-dev] OneTimeUse Clarification

["Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

On 11/21/20, 2:41 PM, "Stefan Rasmusson" <rasmusson.stefan@gmail.com> wrote:

>    Ok, could this for example be in the case of using SAML with web services? And then instead of allowing the sender to
> reuse a token for each request would force the sender to get a newly issued one for each request?

I guess.

>    Interesting. Do you mean that implementations generally do not store the assertion id of received assertion and check
> incoming assertion for replay using this? Instead only relying on the NotAfter attributes?

People rarely cluster replay caches, they're per-node and simply hygiene. The main check is against IssueInstant and against the NotOnOrAfter in the SubjectConfirmation.

-- Scott