Re: RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January 26, 2005

[Xuesi Dong <adam.dong@Sun.COM>]

Having only one saves time and has no harm.

- adam

Thomas Wisniewski wrote:
> No, I meant one (sp and idp share the same one).
>  
> Tom.
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Ciochon, Robert [mailto:Robert.Ciochon@ca.com]
>     *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2005 4:10 PM
>     *To:* Thomas Wisniewski; samldemotech
>     *Subject:* RE: RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
>     26, 2005
> 
>     I assumed so, one for the SP and one for the idP.  Any other opinions?
>     Bob
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Thomas Wisniewski [mailto:Thomas.Wisniewski@entrust.com]
>     *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2005 12:31 PM
>     *To:* samldemotech
>     *Subject:* RE: RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
>     26, 2005
> 
>     Bob, will each vendor use the same cert for signatures (i.e., same
>     one for SP or IDP)? Seems reasonable (and less confusing) to have
>     only one.
>      
>     Thanks, Tom.
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         *From:* Ciochon, Robert [mailto:Robert.Ciochon@ca.com]
>         *Sent:* Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:59 PM
>         *To:* samldemotech
>         *Subject:* RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
>         26, 2005
> 
>         <<rsademotech-minutes-2005-01-26.doc>>
> 
>         *Robert Ciochon*
>         eTrust Development Manager
>         Computer Associates
>         San Diego, California
>         (858) 625-6866
>         robert.ciochon@ca.com
>