[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sarif] Change to invocation.processSuccessful
I’d accept that. Larry From: Michael Fanning <Michael.Fanning@microsoft.com> Can we consider a more descriptive name? ‘processExitedSuccessfully’ for example? From: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <sarif@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Comcast) In merging the change for #115 (process outcome), I made a substantive change to the description of the default value for the invocation.processSuccessful property: Was: If this property is absent, its value SHALL be taken to be true if the exitCode property (§3.13.8) is present and has the value 0; otherwise its value SHALL be taken to be false. Now is: If this property is absent, its value SHALL be taken to be false if the exitCode property (§3.13.8) is present and has a non-zero value; otherwise its value SHALL be taken to be true. Please reply if you disagree. Larry |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]