[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sarif] Change draft for #107 (hash functions)
OK, so I see the way you’ve threaded the needle on this. Mostly, interop hinges on the presence of sha-256 as a commonly produced hash. Developers MAY emit other IANA-HASH function values. I am glad we eliminated SHOULD on this due to the presence of a few long broken/little utilized functions in the list. It is a bit of a shame that we no longer document a reasonable set of names for other hashes, but if our canonical source for this is wiki, that doesn’t seem sufficient.
So, personally I am good with where this landed.
I just printed out Katrina’s crypto doc to read, thanks for posting that, Katrina!
I pushed a change draft for Issue #107: Settle on a small set of hash functions:
I’ll move its adoption at the next TC meeting.
This draft includes feedback from Jim on my original proposal. See the (long) discussion thread in the issue for details.