Re: Acknowledgements (Updated list <- affiliation change of one member)

[Stefan Hagen <stefan@dilettant.eu>]

One update we should not miss:

As of 2018-MAY-07:
OLD: Philip Royer, Phantom
NEW: Philip Royer, Splunk Inc.

Already chaned in below list:

Hi,

I suggest as Participant list offered initially to use:

Andrew Pardoe, Microsoft
Chris Wysopal, CA Technologies
David Keaton, Individual
Douglas Smith, Kestrel Technology
Duncan Sparrell, sFractal Consulting LLC
Everett Maus, Microsoft
Hendrik Buchwald, RIPS Technologies
Henny Sipma, Kestrel Technology
Jim Kupsch, SWAMP
Jordyn Puryear, Microsoft
Joseph Feiman, CA Technologies
Ken Prole, Code Dx, Inc.
Kevin Greene, Mitre Corporation
Larry Hines, Micro Focus
Laurence Golding, Individual
Luke Cartey, Semmle
Mel Llaguno, Synopsys
Michael Fanning, Microsoft
Nikolai Mansourov, Object Management Group
Paul Anderson, GrammaTech, Inc.
Paul Brookes, Microsoft
Paul Patrick, FireEye, Inc.
Philip Royer, Splunk Inc.
Pooya Mehregan, Security Compass
Ram Jeyaraman, Microsoft
Sean Barnum, FireEye, Inc.
Smith Douglas, Kestrel Technology
Stefan Hagen, Individual
Sunny Chatterjee, Microsoft
Tim Hudson, Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.
Trey Darley, New Context Services, Inc.
Vamshi Basupalli, SWAMP
Yekaterina O'Neil, Micro Focus

As withing other TCs I only included members (regardless of voting 
state) iff they attended at least one meeting.

I use the First/Given Name then Last/Family Name convention, as it is 
practiced in some TCs, mirrors best our communication style in the TC 
when conducting business, and helps finding people that sometimes change 
that Last/Family  name (like eg. I did two times in my life).

The affiliation is **not** used as grouping to make clear, that 
individual experts are members of the TC not company delegates.
Of course when being affiliated with a company, it is clear, that the 
members have the clearance from the company they are affiliated with.

People also changed affiliation during lifetime of this TC, so it is 
noted the last, iff they are still members or their last participation 
was with this affiliation.

The restirction on members is naurally derived from the IPR safeguarding 
function of the TC process and by the technical fact, that observers are 
allowed to listen but not to talk during the meetings, thus no input 
possible.

I think this is a good candidate and I would be happy to see this 
included in that way in our first CSD01 "baby"

All the best,
Stefan.