[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Relationship kinds
After discussion with Michael: we believe that this change is both desirable from a design consistency standpoint, and in keeping with the spirit of what the TC approved. It does not add, delete, or change the semantics of any properties,
it simply packages two of the properties into an object for consistency with what we did for reporting descriptor relationships. So I will write the spec this way unless somebody objects (in which case, of course, we’ll discuss it). Larry From: Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) <v-lgold@microsoft.com>
Let me modulate my message there. The two designs are indeed not consistent, and one way to make them consistent – if we think that’s desirable – is what I described. But I make no proposal about what, if anything, we should do about it. Larry From: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <sarif@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) Oooh! Let’s define "relevant" like we did for
reportingDescriptorRelationship.kinds so that – again, like
reportingDescriptorRelationship.kinds –the default for
location.relationshipKinds is
[ "relevant" ]. Having done that – and it hurts me to say this – I see that our location relationship design is inconsistent with our reporting descriptor relationship design. We should have done this for consistency:
Sorrier than I can say (and only partially facetious about that), Larry From: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <sarif@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) As part of our acceptance of #375 (location relationships), I took an action to drive a mailing list discussion about values for
location.relationshipKinds, beyond the two values
"includes" and
"isIncludedBy" that the issue defines. So… any ideas? I will take 30 seconds now to ponder… Some taint-related values? Like
"isSourceOfTaintedDataUsedBy", "isSinkForTaintedDataUsedBy", and
"sanitizesTaintedDataUsedBy". (pretty verbose, but I wanted to be clear about the relationships). Thanks, Larry |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]