RE: [sarif] Second draft of Candidate OASIS Standard statements

["Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc)" <v-lgold@microsoft.com>]

No, I don't.

-----Original Message-----
From: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <sarif@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of David Keaton
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 4:32 PM
To: sarif@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [sarif] Second draft of Candidate OASIS Standard statements

[I'm replying to just the list, to keep from sending multiple copies to the participants in the conversation.]

On 2019-09-06 17:26, Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) wrote:
> I would propose either to
> 
> - Remove entirely the clause "which often requires..."
> OR
> - Replace that clause with "which can be accomplished by modifying the tools to produce SARIF output natively or by providing a converter from the tool's output to SARIF"

      To me, both of those options weaken the case for voting to make SARIF an OASIS standard.  Do you have another key valuable difference between the two to propose in place of this statement?

					David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oasis-open.org%2Fapps%2Forg%2Fworkgroup%2Fportal%2Fmy_workgroups.php&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cv-lgold%40microsoft.com%7Cb80cfaf816e24f30ecfd08d733226799%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637034095171839727&amp;sdata=DkiHA0KwsT3EwatW8gMPC4rsaHZkN8mfemxq8yqGAHY%3D&amp;reserved=0