[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: [sca-assembly] Fwd: [sca-assembly-comment] Ballot closure
One of my OASIS-involved colleagues indicated that he hadn't seen this note from Jim Marino.--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Can someone please clarify? Has Fabric 3 publicly stated conformance, and that was simply lost in the email flood that we all have to deal with? Or is there some formal step that we need to prod Jim to follow through on?
Have either of the chairs followed up with Jim to clarify?
Eric.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [sca-assembly-comment] Ballot closure Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:55:50 +0100 From: Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> To: <sca-assembly-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Hi,
It was brought to my attention that the TC is considering closing.
This caught me by surprise, particularly as it was asserted that there is only one active implementation, which I assume to be Apache Tuscany. Fabric3 (www.fabric3.org) also conforms to the Assembly TC and has active plans to claim conformance to other specifications.
Given the breadth of the specifications, conformance requires a significant time investment.
Closing the TCs down would derail the investment various runtimes have made in this effort. In addition, closing the specifications would hurt the industry in general as no standards exist that cover the same space as SCA.
Is the only issue prompting a ballot for closure that lack of two conformant implementations?
Jim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]