ISSUE 10: URI attribute should not be mandatory for bindings PROPOSEDRESOLUTION

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

PROPOSAL:

Issue 10 should be closed, no action.

This issue has been resolved by the
resolution of Issue 6, which states the following, in part:

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Replace lines 2372 - 2383 with the  following:

uri  - has the following  semantic

The uri attribute can be  omitted.

For the binding of a reference,  the uri attribute defines the target
URI
of the reference.  This MUST be either the componentName/serviceName
for
a wire to an endpoint within the SCA domain, or the accessible address
of some service endpoint either inside or outside the SCA domain (where
the addressing scheme is defined by  the type of the binding).

The  circumstances under which the uri attribute can be used are
defined in  section 3.0.1 Specifying the Target Service(s) for  a
Reference.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that this:

a) makes URI optional
b) points to section 3.0.1 where all
the options for specifying a target for a reference are defined, 
which includes the use of bindng-specific
parameters as an alternative to the URI attribute of the
binding.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU