sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] The sca:Implementation complexType in sca-core.xsddoesn't have the operation child element
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>, Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:00:22 +0000
Raymond,
This is a known problem and it is the
subject of Assembly Issue 30:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-30
The good news is that this is resolved
and we are simply waiting to implement the
necessary changes in the specification
and in the XSDs.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com>
10/03/2008 22:37
|
To
| "'OASIS Assembly'" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [sca-assembly] The sca:Implementation
complexType in sca-core.xsd doesn't have the operation child element |
|
Hi,
The SCA policy framework spec v1.0 has the following pseudo-schema to illustrate
the capability to declare operation-level intents/policySets for implementations.
984 <component name="xs:NCName">
985 <implementation.* policySets="listOfQNames"
986 requires="list of intent xs:QNames">
987 …
988 <operation name="xs:string" service="xs:string"?
989 policySets="listOfQNames"?
990 requires="listOfQNames"?/>*
991 …
992 </implementation>
993 …
994 </component>
I cannot find the operation element for sca:Implementation complexType
in sca-core.xsd.
<element name="implementation" type="sca:Implementation"
abstract="true" />
<complexType name="Implementation" abstract="true">
<attribute name="requires" type="sca:listOfQNames"
use="optional"/>
<attribute name="policySets" type="sca:listOfQNames"
use="optional"/>
</complexType>
Is this a known issue?
Thanks,
Raymond
From:
| ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@Oracle.com>
|
To:
| "'OASIS Assembly'" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 03/04/2008 01:07 PM
|
Subject:
| [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Definition
of Bindings |
Add wording, something like the following, after the second paragraph in
section 7 of the Assembly spec
to clarify that binding types are defined by the vendor and/or user:
Binding types will be defined by vendors and users. This allows vendors
and users to determine the intents
they include in the mayProvides and alwaysProvides attributes of a
binding type definition.
--
All the best, Ashok
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]