[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 14
Ashok, I didn't see a xs:anyAtomicType at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes Is this something that is in the next version of schema? I was trying to find out about the restriction that you are talking about in schema. I couldn't. Can you send me a pointer? Thx. I tried the following using XMLSpy 2006 sp2 -- XSD: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://example.org/test" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xs:element name="value" type="xs:anyType"/> <xs:simpleType name="st"> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"></xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:complexType name="ct"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:string"> <xs:attribute name="attr" type="xs:string"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> XML instance with simple type: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <value xmlns="http://example.org/test" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://example.org/test assembly_issue_14.xsd" xsi:type="st"> some string value </value> XML instance with complex type: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <value xmlns="http://example.org/test" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://example.org/test assembly_issue_14.xsd" xsi:type="ct" attr="some attr value"> some element value </value> It worked the way I was hoping to work. Validating both the XML documents above and not validating XML documents that do not conform to the declared xsi:type value. -Anish -- ashok malhotra wrote: > Here is a proposal that will work. > > Define an element called <ComplexValue> that has Schema type xs:anyType. > Use xsi:Type to indicate the precise complex type used. > > Define an element called <SimpleValue> that has Schema type > xs:anyAtomicType. > Use xsi:Type to indicate the precise type used. > > I'll talk with my Schema colleagues to see if we can get away with a > single value type.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]