NEW ISSUE: Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are.

["Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com>]

RAISER: Mark Combellack

 

TARGET: SCA Assembly Specification

 

DESCRIPTION:

 

Constraining Type talks about non-optional references but does not define what they are.

 

(References taken from SCA Assembly Specification Committee Draft 01 with RFC 2119 updates (dated 2008-04-22))

 

Page 62: Lines 2150 - 2153

2150     An

2151     implementation may contain additional services, additional optional references and additional

2152     optional properties, but cannot contain additional non-optional references or additional non

2153     optional properties (a non-optional property is one with no default value applied).

 

The above text talks about non-optional references and non-optional properties. It defines non-optional properties but does not define non-optional references.

 

 

PROPOSAL:

 

Replace the bracketed text on Page 62: Line 2153 with the following text.

 

“A non-optional reference is a reference with a multiplicity of 1..1 or 1..N. A non-optional property is a property with no default value applied.”

 

Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | mcombellack@avaya.com