ISSUE 63: Specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable interfaces are specified.

[Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com>]

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-63

On May 2, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Mark Combellack wrote:
> RAISER: Mark Combellack
>
> TARGET: SCA Assembly Specification
>
> DESCRIPTION:
>
> The specification wording unclear on how local and remoteable  
> interfaces are specified. It does not cover other options that may  
> be used by other languages such as C/C++, BPEL, etc
>
>
> (References taken from SCA Assembly Specification Committee Draft 01  
> with RFC 2119 updates (dated 2008-04-22))
>
> Page 108: Lines 4095 - 4096
> 4095     A service is remotable if it is defined by a WSDL port type  
> or if it [is] defined by a Java Interface
> 4096     marked with the @Remotable annotation
>
> There is a missing "is" in the sentence. I added it above as [is]
>
> These are not the only ways to make a remotable service. If they  
> are, then C remotable services must define a WSDL interface or a  
> Java interface.
>
>
>
> Page 109: Lines 4104 - 4105
> 4104          Currently a service is local only if it [is] defined  
> by a Java Interface not marked with the @Remotable
> 4105          annotation.
>
> There is a missing "is" in the sentence. I added it above as [is]
>
> This paragraph could be interpreted to mean that all C/C++  
> interfaces are Remotable as they do not define a Java Interface and  
> are not marked with @Remotable.
>
>
> PROPOSAL:
>
> Replace Page 108: Lines 4095 – 4096 with the following text:
>
> “How a Service is identified as remotable is dependant on the  
> Component implementation technology used. See the relevant SCA  
> Implementation Specification for more information. As an example, to  
> define a Remotable Service, a Component implemented in Java would  
> have a Java Interface with the @Remotable annotation”
>
> Replace Page 109: Lines 4104 - 4105
> “How a Service is identified as local is dependant on the Component  
> implementation technology used. See the relevant SCA Implementation  
> Specification for more information. As an example, to define a Local  
> Service, a Component implemented in Java would define a Java  
> Interface that does not have the @Remotable annotation”
>
>
> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park |  
> St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | mcombellack@avaya.com
>
>
>
>
> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park |  
> St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | mcombellack@avaya.com
>
>