[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [Issue 82] NEW ISSUE: Relax <component/> schema to allow <implementation/> anywhere
The hard wired sequence you've shown below is where we started years ago. That structure was deemed inflexible, and the choice was added. I still agree with the notion that a flexible structure would be beneficial.
Since opening this latest issue, several schema experiments have been attempted to arrive at a solution, but none of them has been successful (UPA failures). I'm no longer certain if this issue is solvable given schema rules AND where we have placed the extensibility points. I was hoping you'd have a brainstorm.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Anish Karmarkar ---09/23/2008 01:33:07 AM---I've always wondered why we have that choice. Apologies, if this was discussed before and I have fo
![]() From: | ![]() Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> |
![]() To: | ![]() David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS |
![]() Cc: | ![]() sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org |
![]() Date: | ![]() 09/23/2008 01:33 AM |
![]() Subject: | ![]() Re: [Issue 82] NEW ISSUE: Relax <component/> schema to allow <implementation/> anywhere |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]