ISSUE 92: Assembly Specification should not state what marks a Java interface as Local

[Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com>]

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-92

On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:

>
> Raiser:                Mike Edwards
>
> Target:                SCA Assembly Specification - sca-assembly-1.1- 
> spec-cd01-rev2.doc
>
> Description:
>
> In lines 2425-2426, the Assembly specification makes a statement  
> about what marks out a Java interface as being Local:
>
> "In the case of Java a local service is defined by a Java interface  
> definition without a @Remotable annotation."
>
> The Assembly specification has no business defining things that  
> relate to an artifact that is normatively defined by another
> specification, namely the Java Common Annotations & APIs  
> specification.  This becomes a problem if and when the Java
> CAA specification changes the way in which a Java interface is  
> marked as Local.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Remove the sentence relating to Java interfaces in Lines 2425 -2426.
>
>
> Yours,  Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
> PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
>