[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal
The text for 50023 and 50024 mentions the same conformance statements. I don't understand what that's trying to tell me. Is it saying that all of the rules in 50018-50021 can be checked at deployment time or at runtime? Or is there something more subtle being stated?
typo in 12008 - MAY not to provide
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Mike Edwards ---02/16/2009 07:06:18 AM---Folks, Here is my proposal to fix the problems with the normative statements
From: | Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> |
To: | "OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org> |
Date: | 02/16/2009 07:06 AM |
Subject: | [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements - Proposal |
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]