sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Draft Minutes from 2009-02-17 are attached
- From: Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- To: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:04:12 -0500
Title: SCA-Assy - 2009-02-17
Hide Chat
Action Items
- Done:
- id=2009-01-26-07 status=done Mike: to review section 6.4 for missing normative statements
- Pending:
- id=2009-01-26-03 status=pending MikeE to review the implementation example (section 4.3) for its consistency with rest of the spec.
Resolutions
- 2009-02-17-1: Minutes of 2009-02-10 approved w/o
- 2009-02-17-2: m:Karmarkar s:Wells New Issue Assembly-110 opened w/o
- 2009-02-17-3: m:Aupperle s:Estefan Resolve Assembly-110 with the proposal as contained in the jira (with a lowercase uri) w/o
- 2009-02-17-4: m:Aupperle s:Karmarkar New Issue Assembly-111 opened w/o
- 2009-02-17-5: m:Karmarkar s:Combellack Resolve Assembly-111 with the proposal contained in the jira with the new assertion being numbered
ASM0037 w/o
- 2009-02-17-6: m:Booz s:Karmarkar New Issue Assembly-112 opened w/o
- 2009-02-17-7: m:Booz s:Aupperle Resolve Assembly-112 with the proposal contained in the jira w/o
- 2009-02-17-8: m:Booz s:Aupperle New Issue Assembly-113 opened w/o
- 2009-02-17-9: Resolve Assembly-113 with item 2 in Vamsi's proposal in the jira with descriptiv text explaining why no default value appears
w/o
- 2009-02-17-10: m:Booz s:Aupperle New Issue Assembly-114 opened w/o
- 2009-02-17-11: m:Booz s:Malhotra Resolve Assembly-114 by closing with no action w/o
Minutes
Opening
Roll - quorate with 16 of 22 voting members present
Resolution: Minutes of 2009-02-10 approved w/o
Action Items
Action: id=2009-01-26-03 status=pending MikeE to review the implementation example (section 4.3) for its consistency with rest of
the spec.
Action: id=2009-01-26-07 status=done Mike: to review section 6.4 for missing normative statements
Administrivia
We plan to vote the new cd next week which is intended to become the first public review draft
New Issues
Edwards channels Nash and represents the new issue
Resolution: m:Karmarkar s:Wells New Issue Assembly-110 opened w/o
Resolution: m:Aupperle s:Estefan Resolve Assembly-110 with the proposal as contained in the jira (with a lowercase uri) w/o
Vamsi takes the TC through his new issue
<Mike Edwards>
The line numbers relate to Assembly spec CD02 Rev4
<Mike Edwards>
that got left out of the Issue description
Resolution: m:Aupperle s:Karmarkar New Issue Assembly-111 opened w/o
<anish>
since appendix C is a derived object, changes in 3 should be sufficient
<Mike Edwards>
New conformance statement should be numbered [ASM50037]
Resolution: m:Karmarkar s:Combellack Resolve Assembly-111 with the proposal contained in the jira with the new assertion being numbered
ASM0037 w/o
Vamsi describes his new issue
Resolution: m:Booz s:Karmarkar New Issue Assembly-112 opened w/o
Resolution: m:Booz s:Aupperle Resolve Assembly-112 with the proposal contained in the jira w/o
Vamsi described his new issue
Resolution: m:Booz s:Aupperle New Issue Assembly-113 opened w/o
<anish>
this would be a case of impl defined default that are not SCA defaults -- we have in the past talked about this. I see this
as a good example of that
Motion: m:Nash s:Booz Resolve Assembly-113 with item 2 in Vamsi's proposal in the jira with descriptiv text explaining why no default
value appears
Resolution: Resolve Assembly-113 with item 2 in Vamsi's proposal in the jira with descriptiv text explaining why no default value appears
w/o
Resolution: m:Booz s:Aupperle New Issue Assembly-114 opened w/o
Vamsi discusses his proposal contained in the jira
Resolution: m:Booz s:Malhotra Resolve Assembly-114 by closing with no action w/o
Issues not Reported by Vamsi
Edwards discusses the proposal
<EricW>
+1 to Ashok's statement
<EricW>
MUST raise an error - SHOULD raise as soon as possible
<anish>
wouldn't it be easier to say: either both (src and tgt) have a callback interface or none have it
<anish>
perhaps we should define "A being compatible with B" (directional) and use that for source/target as well as callbacks
[End of Minutes]
Formatted on 2009-02-18 at 14:56:53 GMT-5
Minutes formatted by Schreiber, a collection of XSLT
stylesheets by Bob Freund modeled after David Booth's scribe
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
statistics: Schreiber found 56 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 25: s/bvote/vote
edits: Line 78: s/rasie/raise/
edits: Line 79: s/and/an/
command-scribe: Line 11: Since the line number is less than or equal to 20 we will interpret this as a scribename command,
note that the scribe command is deprecated
command-scribe: Line 11: Bob Freund is recognized
command-scribe: Line 11: Bob Freund's nick Bob has been selected
edit-substitute: command on line 25 succeeded, changed line 21 from 'bvote' to 'vote'
edit-delete: Line 25 was deleted
edit-substitute: command on line 78 succeeded, changed line 76 from 'rasie' to 'raise'
edit-substitute: command on line 79 succeeded, changed line 76 from 'and' to 'an'
edit-delete: Line 78 was deleted
edit-delete: Line 79 was deleted
command-oasisroll: Line 88: Attempting to fetch roll from http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/event.php?event_id=16079
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.0.0.6
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]
smime.p7s
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]