Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset- Updated Proposal

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Dave,

Many thanks for the review

Updated proposal here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31877/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue117a.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31876/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue117a.doc

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To:	sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	31/03/2009 14:54
Subject:	Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset - Updated Proposal

---

Some comments based on a search of the proposal document
for the word compatible:

line 1259: I think this is ok as it is.
Agreed
line 1757, 1767: I think these should say compatible superset
Agreed
line 1885: This is a bit awkward because ASM60022 uses the new "compatible
interface" term and then re-defines the term in ASM60023. It might
be more clear to rework ASM60022 to use the term compatible superset, then
we could get rid of ASM60022.
Agreed - see if you like my new wording
line 2603: seems ok as it is
OK
line 2607 and 2614: should be compatible superset as per ASM50004 on line
741.
Hmm - a bit messy.  See if you like
my new approach here.
line 2618 needs to be updated to point to section 7.2.
Good catch
line 2504: Is there a reason why #5 is not combined with #3 on line 2499?
Yes - see what happens for superset and
subset
I intended the 3 cases to run parallel to
each other...
---------------
As as aside, line 1035 talks about property type compatibility, which might
need some work? If you agree, I'll open a new issue.
Yep, that's a new issue  :-(



thanks

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Mike
Edwards ---03/31/2009 08:47:08 AM---Folks, Here is an updated proposal
in the form of a change marked version built

From:	Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
To:	"OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	03/31/2009 08:47 AM
Subject:	[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset - Updated Proposal

---

Folks, 

Here is an updated proposal in the form of a change marked version built
from CD03. 

This proposal creates formal definitions of Compatible interfaces, Compatible
superset interface 
and Compatible subset interfaces. It then adjusts relevant parts of the
specification to use those 
terms. 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31875/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%20Issue117.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31874/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%20Issue117.doc

I note that this proposal also resolves Issue 116 since it defines how
interfaces are compared. 


Yours, Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU