Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Need definition of compatible for propertytypes

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Logged as:  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-127


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To:	sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	06/04/2009 21:16
Subject:	[sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Need definition of compatible for property types

---

TARGET: Assembly spec CD03 [1]

DESCRIPTION: 
Line 1036 of CD03 [1] says that if a component specifies a property type,
then that type must be compatible with the type of the same property in
the componentType. What does compatible mean? It might be as simple as
the same type of sub-type (i.e though some form of inheritance), but it
needs to be specified.

PROPOSAL:
None

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31740/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.pdf



Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU