[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE 132: Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Model specification
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-132 On Apr 27, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Martin Chapman wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Champion [mailto:Michael.Champion@microsoft.com] > Sent: 24 April 2009 18:30 > To: sca-assembly-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [sca-assembly-comment] Microsoft technical comment about > the SCA Assembly Model specification > > The following is a Microsoft technical comment about the SCA > Assembly Model specification that is being developed by OASIS Service > Component Architecture / Assembly (SCA-Assembly) TC. > > Given the stated charter of the OASIS Open CSA Member Section to > "unify [software] services regardless of programming language or > deployment platform," we would like to see the specification to be > as inclusive and platform/language neutral as possible. In that > regard, we observe that the SCA specifications should be open to a > diversity of implementation choices, and not restrict them. > > Upon reviewing the Assembly Model specification v1.1, CD 03, we have > noticed that section 13.2 currently reads: > > "The implementation MUST support and comply with at least one of the > Open CSA Member Section adopted implementation types." > > The above should be changed as in the following: > > The implementation MUST support at least one implementation type: > a) as defined by the Open CSA Member Section or, > b) as defined in the XML Schema implementation substitution > group as described by Section 10 (Extension Model). > > We also respectfully request that each SCA committee should > carefully review its specifications to make any similar changes > necessary to ensure that every SCA specification is open and neutral > with respect to customer and implementation choices. > > As foundational sponsor-level member of OASIS, Microsoft > demonstrates the highest level of commitment to open standards and > industry-wide interoperability. Such interoperability is best served > by allowing for as many large and diverse implementation types > as possible based on variety of operating environments and > languages, as opposed to a limited and fixed list of choices defined > by > the TC at a given time. > > Michael Champion > OASIS voting member - Microsoft Corporation > > -- > This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the > OASIS Service Component Architecture / Assembly (SCA-Assembly) TC. > > In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and > to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required > before posting. > > Subscribe: sca-assembly-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > Unsubscribe: sca-assembly-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > List help: sca-assembly-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org > List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly-comment/ > Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=sca-assembly > Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]