With a strict chair hat on, we really need to look at the
broader schedule here.
In order to progress to Committee Specification we need at
least two implementations passing the tests and showing some kind of interop.
As a Chair I have no idea when two implementations will surface
to meet this criteria.
If they surface soon I share the schedule concerns expressed by
If two implementations are not on the near horizon, then I see
no problem in discussing resolutions to issue-80.
From: Mike Edwards
Sent: 23 June 2009 10:13
To: OASIS Assembly
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution
Thank you for
Can I ask for
your assessment on the likely impact of this approach to the schedule of
completion of the
Assembly Model specification V1.1 and also for your assessment of the likely
impact to the
the other affected specifications?
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
[Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution
I would like to propose that we use the
contribution at , as a basis
for a directional resolution for issue 80 . Specifically, we
introduce the concepts of events, event types, producers, consumers,
channels; and the changes these concepts make to the existing
If this directional resolution is accepted, I suggest that an inlined
document (with change marks) be produced that provides a merge between
 and the existing latest version of SCA Assembly. This would then
serve as a basis for the resolution of issue 80.
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU